+23 votes
in Chemistry by
edited by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
+19 votes
by

In the carbon-in-leach (CIL) and carbon-in-pulp (CIP) processes, impurities such as copper, iron, and sulfur can have negative effects on the efficiency of gold recovery. These impurities can interfere with the adsorption of gold onto activated carbon or cause other operational challenges. Here are some ways in which these impurities can impact the CIL/CIP process and strategies to mitigate their effects:

  1. Copper:

    • Effect: Copper can compete with gold for adsorption sites on activated carbon, reducing the overall gold recovery. It can also cause increased carbon fouling and higher cyanide consumption.
    • Mitigation strategies: The presence of copper can be mitigated through several methods, including:
      • pH adjustment: Maintaining a slightly acidic pH (around 9-10) can help reduce the adsorption of copper onto activated carbon.
      • Cyanide control: Controlling and optimizing the cyanide concentration can minimize the negative effects of copper.
      • Activated carbon management: Implementing carbon regeneration or replacement strategies can help alleviate copper buildup on the carbon, maintaining its adsorption capacity.
      • Selective adsorption: Some specialized activated carbons have a higher affinity for gold over copper, allowing for selective adsorption and improved recovery.
  2. Iron:

    • Effect: Iron can cause the precipitation of iron hydroxides, resulting in increased carbon fouling, loss of activity, and reduced gold adsorption capacity. It can also lead to increased consumption of oxygen during the leaching process.
    • Mitigation strategies: Strategies to mitigate the effects of iron include:
      • pH adjustment: Maintaining a slightly acidic pH can help minimize iron precipitation and its negative impact.
      • Filtration or settling: Pre-treatment of the slurry to remove suspended iron hydroxides through filtration or settling can reduce iron-related issues.
      • Oxygen management: Effective oxygen control during the leaching process can minimize iron oxidation and subsequent precipitation.
  3. Sulfur:

    • Effect: Sulfur can react with cyanide to form thiocyanate, which can reduce the availability of free cyanide for gold dissolution. Thiocyanate can also result in the passivation of gold surfaces and decrease gold recovery.
    • Mitigation strategies: Strategies to mitigate the effects of sulfur include:
      • pH adjustment: Maintaining an alkaline pH (around 10-11) can help minimize the formation of thiocyanate and its negative impact on gold recovery.
      • Oxidation: Pre-treatment methods such as oxidation with hydrogen peroxide or ozone can help convert sulfur compounds to less reactive forms and reduce their interference with gold dissolution.
      • Cyanide control: Optimizing the cyanide concentration and maintaining sufficient free cyanide levels can help overcome the effects of sulfur.

It's important to note that the specific strategies employed to mitigate the negative effects of impurities can vary depending on the ore composition, process conditions, and specific equipment used in the CIL/CIP circuit. Therefore, it's essential to consider site-specific factors and consult with process engineers and metallurgists to develop effective mitigation strategies for a particular operation.

Welcome to Physicsgurus Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...