I can provide some insight into the topic you've raised.
Throughout history, there have been instances where scientists and thinkers have attributed their breakthroughs or insights to experiences or inspirations that may fall into the realm of what some might term "woo-woo" or mystical phenomena. This can include dreams, visions, or intuitive flashes of understanding.
For example, Friedrich August Kekulé, a chemist, famously claimed that he discovered the ring structure of benzene after having a dream of a snake biting its own tail, which led him to the concept of a cyclic molecule.
Similarly, Albert Einstein and René Descartes have occasionally been associated with mystical or spiritual ideas, though it's important to note that the majority of their scientific contributions were grounded in rigorous observation, experimentation, and mathematical reasoning.
It's worth acknowledging that inspiration and creativity can arise from various sources, and the human mind can make unexpected connections and associations. However, it's also important to differentiate between personal experiences that inspire creativity and the rigorous scientific process that involves empirical evidence, testing, and peer review.
Science is a systematic endeavor that relies on evidence, logic, and critical thinking to understand the natural world. While personal experiences or revelations may provide inspiration, scientific breakthroughs ultimately need to be supported by empirical data and subjected to rigorous scrutiny.
In summary, while there may be instances where individuals attribute their scientific insights to unconventional sources, the core of scientific progress lies in the rigorous application of the scientific method and the accumulation of evidence-based knowledge.