+122 votes
in Physics of Everyday Life by (2.5k points)
edited by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
+7 votes
by (3.8k points)

According to our current understanding of physics, traveling faster than the speed of light is not possible for objects with mass. The theory of special relativity, proposed by Albert Einstein, states that as an object with mass approaches the speed of light, its relativistic mass increases infinitely, requiring an infinite amount of energy to accelerate it to the speed of light.

However, if we consider a hypothetical scenario where an object could travel faster than the speed of light, it would lead to some interesting consequences. According to the equations of special relativity, as an object approaches the speed of light, time dilation occurs, which means that time appears to slow down for the moving object relative to a stationary observer.

If an object were to exceed the speed of light, it would imply that it has broken the fundamental laws of physics as we currently understand them. Speculating about the consequences in such a scenario is purely hypothetical and beyond the realm of known science. It's unclear what would happen regarding time travel or the direction of movement in time, as our current understanding of physics doesn't accommodate such scenarios.

It's worth noting that time travel is a subject often explored in science fiction, where different theories and concepts are often proposed for the sake of storytelling. However, in the realm of actual science, our understanding of the laws of physics suggests that exceeding the speed of light and time travel as commonly portrayed in fiction are not feasible with our current knowledge.

Welcome to Physicsgurus Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...