In the scientific process, including the evaluation of different paradigms or theories, it is generally expected that claims and hypotheses are held to a consistent standard. The scientific community evaluates theories based on their ability to explain and predict empirical observations, as well as their internal coherence, mathematical consistency, and explanatory power.
Within the current paradigm of quantum mechanics, just like any other scientific framework, discrepancies are not typically "fudged." Rather, they are investigated and examined in order to refine and improve the theory. When experimental or observational results contradict the predictions of a theory, scientists strive to understand the source of the discrepancy and either propose modifications to the theory or conduct further experiments to verify or refute the results. The scientific community values consistency and rigor in the evaluation of theories, and it does not generally tolerate the intentional manipulation of data or results.
Similarly, when evaluating alternative paradigms or hypotheses, they are subject to the same scrutiny and standards of evidence as the established scientific theories. If a hypothesis makes a prediction that is consistently contradicted by empirical observations or lacks internal consistency, it would be considered problematic or incomplete. However, it is important to note that the evaluation of alternative paradigms can sometimes face additional challenges, such as the burden of proof, the requirement for explanatory power, and the ability to account for existing experimental results.
The level playing field in science is based on the consistent application of scientific methods, logical reasoning, empirical evidence, and critical evaluation. The scientific community seeks to evaluate and refine theories in an objective manner, regardless of whether they are part of the established paradigm or represent alternative viewpoints. Ideas and hypotheses that withstand rigorous testing, scrutiny, and peer review are the ones that gain acceptance and contribute to the advancement of scientific understanding.