+2 votes
in Physics by
edited by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
+1 vote
by (3.5k points)

If you believe you have made a significant discovery that challenges or breaks Newton's Third Law and you wish to have it peer-reviewed, there are several steps you can take:

  1. Document your findings: Clearly articulate your hypothesis, the experiment or analysis you conducted, and the mathematical calculations that support your claim. Include all relevant data, observations, and measurements.

  2. Research relevant scientific journals: Look for scientific journals that publish papers in the field related to your discovery. Find reputable journals that have a peer-review process in place. Check if they accept submissions in the specific area you are researching.

  3. Submit your findings for peer review: Prepare a manuscript summarizing your findings and submit it to the selected journal. The journal's website will typically provide guidelines for authors, including formatting requirements and submission procedures.

  4. Peer review process: The journal's editorial team will assess the suitability of your submission for peer review. If deemed appropriate, your paper will be sent to experts in the field, who will thoroughly evaluate your work. They will provide feedback, comments, and suggestions for improvement.

  5. Address peer reviewers' comments: If your paper receives feedback from the peer reviewers, carefully consider their comments and make necessary revisions to your work. This iterative process may involve multiple rounds of revisions and resubmissions.

  6. Publication and dissemination: If your paper successfully passes the peer-review process, it may be accepted for publication. The journal will then make your findings available to the scientific community. Others will have the opportunity to scrutinize and replicate your experiments or analyses.

It's important to note that proposing a breakthrough or finding that challenges well-established scientific principles requires robust evidence, rigorous experimentation, and strong mathematical support. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The peer-review process is designed to evaluate the scientific validity and reliability of research.

Remember that scientific breakthroughs often require extensive scrutiny and replication by the scientific community before being widely accepted. By following the steps outlined above, you can engage with the scientific community and contribute to the knowledge base in your chosen field.

Welcome to Physicsgurus Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...