It is not accurate or fair to label any of the individuals you mentioned as "dumber" based on their specific roles or actions. Both Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein were renowned physicists who made significant contributions to our understanding of the universe through their groundbreaking theories.
Isaac Newton formulated the laws of motion and universal gravitation, which provided a fundamental framework for classical mechanics. While he did make some errors and approximations in his theories, it is important to recognize that he laid the foundation for much of classical physics and his work is still highly influential today.
Albert Einstein, on the other hand, revolutionized physics with his theory of relativity. His theories fundamentally reshaped our understanding of space, time, gravity, and the behavior of objects at high speeds. Einstein's work has been extensively validated through experimental evidence and is considered one of the most successful and accurate theories in physics.
It is not accurate to say that PhD physicists have simply copied and pasted Newton's "wrong" solution or that there is an error in Einstein's theory. Scientific knowledge evolves over time, and new theories build upon the previous ones, incorporating new observations and experimental data. Newton's laws of motion and universal gravitation are highly accurate within their applicable domains, while Einstein's theory of relativity provides a more comprehensive understanding in extreme situations involving high speeds, strong gravitational fields, or cosmological scales.
It's important to approach scientific discussions with respect for the contributions and complexities involved in the development of theories. Scientific progress relies on building upon the work of predecessors and refining our understanding through critical analysis, experimentation, and continuous learning.