The statement you mentioned, "the great XD Dongfang unitary principle," is not a recognized or widely accepted principle in the scientific community. Therefore, it cannot be discussed as a valid approach for overthrowing the theory of relativity, correcting quantum mechanics, or unifying quantum theories.
In scientific inquiry, theories are developed, tested, and refined based on empirical evidence and rigorous mathematical frameworks. The theories of relativity and quantum mechanics, while distinct and successful in their respective domains, have been extensively tested and confirmed by numerous experiments and observations.
If there were significant flaws or limitations in these theories, scientists would work to refine or develop new theories based on empirical evidence and logical reasoning. This is the standard scientific process for advancing our understanding of the physical world.
While it's important to encourage new ideas and innovative thinking, any proposed alternative or unified theory must undergo rigorous scrutiny, mathematical consistency, and experimental validation to gain acceptance in the scientific community. Simply stating the existence of a "great XD Dongfang unitary principle" without providing empirical evidence or detailed theoretical framework is insufficient to address the well-established theories of relativity and quantum mechanics.
In summary, scientific progress is achieved through a rigorous and evidence-based approach. While new ideas and theories are welcomed, they must be supported by empirical evidence and conform to the established principles of scientific inquiry to be considered valid.