+17 votes
in Astronomy by
edited by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
+14 votes
by (3.5k points)

the status of Pluto as a planet remains a subject of debate among astronomers and the scientific community. In 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) redefined the definition of a planet, which resulted in Pluto being reclassified as a "dwarf planet."

According to the IAU's definition, a planet must meet three criteria: it must orbit the Sun, it must be spherical in shape, and it must have cleared its orbit of other debris. It is this third criterion that Pluto did not satisfy, as it shares its orbital neighborhood with other icy bodies in the Kuiper Belt.

The idea of "clearing its neighborhood" refers to a planet's ability to gravitationally dominate its orbital region by either ejecting or capturing other objects. Pluto's orbit intersects with the Kuiper Belt, which contains numerous smaller bodies, some of which are comparable in size to Pluto itself. This is why it was deemed that Pluto had not "cleared its neighborhood" and was reclassified as a dwarf planet.

To answer your question directly, based on the current IAU definition, if Pluto continues to orbit within the Kuiper Belt and interact with other objects in its vicinity, it would not meet the criteria necessary to be classified as a planet. However, it's worth noting that scientific understanding can evolve over time, and future revisions to the definition of a planet may change the status of Pluto or introduce new categories of celestial objects.

Welcome to Physicsgurus Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...