No, the double-slit and delayed-choice quantum eraser experiments do not provide evidence that we live in a simulation. These experiments are fascinating demonstrations of the wave-particle duality of quantum particles and the role of observation in quantum mechanics. However, they do not directly support the hypothesis that our reality is a simulation.
The interpretation of these experiments within the framework of quantum mechanics is subject to various interpretations, such as the Copenhagen interpretation, many-worlds interpretation, pilot-wave theory, and more. These interpretations offer different explanations for the behavior of particles in these experiments, but they do not imply that we live in a simulated reality.
The idea that our reality is a simulation, often referred to as the simulation hypothesis, suggests that our entire universe is a computer-generated simulation created by a more advanced civilization or entity. This hypothesis is speculative and falls outside the realm of scientific evidence or experimental verification at present.
While the double-slit and delayed-choice quantum eraser experiments provide insights into the peculiar nature of quantum mechanics, they do not provide direct evidence or support for the simulation hypothesis. The simulation hypothesis remains a philosophical and speculative concept that is currently beyond the scope of scientific investigation.