In the double-slit experiment, the result is that when particles such as electrons or photons are fired at a barrier with two slits, they exhibit wave-like behavior and create an interference pattern on a screen behind the barrier. This interference pattern indicates the wave-like nature of particles and is a fundamental characteristic of quantum mechanics.
If there are no observers or measurements made during the experiment, the interference pattern will still be observed. This has been demonstrated in numerous experiments where the particles interact only with the apparatus but not with any conscious observers. The interference pattern arises due to the wave-particle duality of quantum objects, where they exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties simultaneously.
It is important to note that the absence of observers or measurements does not invalidate quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is a well-established and highly successful theory that accurately describes the behavior of particles at the microscopic level. The double-slit experiment is one of the many experimental confirmations of the principles of quantum mechanics.
The analogy you mentioned refers to the fact that the double-slit experiment and other quantum phenomena are often used as illustrative examples to explain certain philosophical questions and debates surrounding the nature of reality, consciousness, and observation. While these analogies can provoke thought-provoking discussions, they should not be confused with the actual experimental results and interpretations within the framework of quantum mechanics.
In summary, the absence of observers does not invalidate quantum mechanics, and the results of the double-slit experiment remain consistent with the principles of quantum mechanics regardless of the presence or absence of conscious observers.