based on the quote you provided, it suggests that there may be a need to revise or update our current understanding of cosmology based on new observations. Science is a dynamic field, and as new data and evidence emerge, scientific theories and models are subject to revision or even replacement.
Cosmology, the study of the origin, evolution, and structure of the universe, is an area of ongoing research and exploration. Our understanding of cosmology has significantly evolved over time as new observations, such as those from telescopes and satellites, have provided valuable insights into the nature of the universe. These observations have led to the formulation of various theories, such as the Big Bang theory and the inflationary universe theory, which have provided frameworks to understand the early universe.
However, it is important to note that scientific understanding is not static, and it is subject to change as new data and observations become available. If follow-up observations suggest the need for significant adjustments or modifications to current cosmological models, scientists may propose new theories or introduce new elements into existing models to better explain the observed phenomena.
This continuous process of refinement and revision is a fundamental aspect of scientific progress. Scientists critically evaluate existing theories, test them through observations and experiments, and refine or develop new theories based on the results. Therefore, it is not uncommon for scientific fields like cosmology to undergo updates and revisions as our knowledge and understanding advance.