Yes, it is possible to propose that the answer to the Fermi Paradox, which refers to the apparent contradiction between the high probability of extraterrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for their existence, could be related to the self-destruction of advanced alien civilizations through environmental issues such as runaway climate change.
This idea, sometimes referred to as the "Great Filter" hypothesis, suggests that there may be various obstacles or challenges that prevent civilizations from progressing to a level of technological advancement where they become detectable or capable of interstellar communication. One of these potential filters could indeed be the destruction of their own planets due to environmental degradation or climate change.
The argument is that as civilizations advance and develop technology, they may inadvertently cause irreversible damage to their ecosystems, leading to catastrophic consequences for their own survival. This could manifest as climate change, resource depletion, or other ecological disasters that ultimately hinder their ability to thrive or survive as a civilization.
However, it's important to note that the Fermi Paradox has various proposed explanations, and the hypothesis of self-destruction due to climate change is just one possibility among many. Other explanations include the rarity of life, limitations of interstellar travel, the possibility of civilizations being too far apart in space and time, or the potential for advanced civilizations to exist but remain undetectable to us.
The answer to the Fermi Paradox is still a subject of speculation and ongoing scientific inquiry, and there is no definitive consensus on the exact reasons why we haven't detected evidence of advanced alien civilizations.