Scientific studies and theories should not be considered as "scientific truths" in the sense of absolute and final truths. Science is a constantly evolving process that aims to understand and explain the natural world based on empirical evidence and rigorous experimentation. The nature of science is such that theories and conclusions are always subject to further scrutiny, refinement, and revision as new evidence emerges.
Scientific knowledge is built upon a foundation of accumulated evidence, logical reasoning, and experimentation. The scientific method encourages the formation of hypotheses, the testing of those hypotheses through experimentation, and the peer review process for evaluating and validating scientific findings. However, even well-established scientific theories are provisional in nature and are subject to modification or abandonment if new evidence challenges them.
Scientific progress often involves the formulation of new hypotheses that better explain existing observations or provide new predictions. This iterative process of testing, refining, and expanding upon existing knowledge is what drives scientific advancement. It is important to recognize that scientific theories represent the best explanations based on the available evidence at a given time, but they are always open to revision and refinement.
Therefore, it is more accurate to view scientific studies and theories as our current best understanding of the natural world rather than absolute truths. As new evidence is gathered and new experiments are conducted, our understanding of scientific phenomena may evolve and change. Scientific consensus is reached through extensive peer review, replication of experiments, and a broad agreement among experts in the field. However, it is always possible for new evidence or alternative explanations to challenge prevailing theories and lead to paradigm shifts in scientific understanding.