+153 votes
in Science by
edited by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
+53 votes
by

Creation science, also known as young Earth creationism, is a religious belief system that seeks to reconcile the accounts of the Bible with scientific explanations. Regarding endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), which are remnants of ancient viral infections found within the DNA of organisms, creation science offers alternative interpretations that differ from mainstream scientific understanding. It's important to note that the scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the theory of evolution and provides well-supported explanations for ERVs. However, I can outline some common arguments put forth by proponents of creation science:

  1. Created Functional Elements: Creation scientists suggest that rather than being remnants of ancient viral infections, ERVs may have been intentionally designed and incorporated into the genetic makeup of organisms for a functional purpose. They propose that these elements may have had regulatory or beneficial roles in the organisms' biology. However, this viewpoint generally lacks empirical evidence and is not widely accepted within the scientific community.

  2. Degeneration and Loss: Another argument posited by creationists is that ERVs are the result of degeneration and loss of genetic information over time. They argue that these elements were once functional genes but have undergone mutations and loss of functionality due to the effects of the Fall, referring to the concept of the original sin in Christian theology. According to this perspective, ERVs are seen as genetic relics rather than evidence of common ancestry.

  3. Common Design: Creationists also invoke the concept of "common design" to explain the presence of ERVs across different species. They propose that the similar patterns of ERVs found in various organisms are not indicative of shared ancestry but rather reflect a common blueprint or design implemented by a Creator. This argument is based on the idea that a designer could use similar genetic elements in different organisms for functional or structural purposes.

It is important to note that the arguments put forth by creation science are not supported by the mainstream scientific community. The scientific consensus, based on extensive evidence from multiple fields such as genetics, paleontology, and molecular biology, supports the understanding that ERVs are remnants of ancient viral infections that became integrated into the genomes of organisms over evolutionary time. This evidence is consistent with the theory of evolution and the idea of common descent, which proposes that all living organisms share a common ancestry.

Welcome to Physicsgurus Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...