The statement that "science keeps changing what it says it's proved" can be a bit misleading. Science is a dynamic and self-correcting process that continually evolves as new evidence and information emerge. It doesn't claim to have absolute or unchanging truths, but it provides the best available explanations based on the current understanding of the natural world.
The reason why some people may express a preference for relying on scientific evidence over religious beliefs is because science offers a rigorous methodology for investigating the natural world. It relies on observation, experimentation, and peer review to gather and evaluate evidence. Scientific theories are continually tested and refined as new data becomes available. This process allows for the advancement of knowledge and a deeper understanding of the universe.
In contrast, religious beliefs are often based on faith, personal experiences, and sacred texts. While these beliefs can provide moral and spiritual guidance, they are not subject to the same empirical scrutiny as scientific claims. Religious beliefs typically involve matters of faith and are not always based on verifiable evidence or subject to the same level of critical analysis and revision.
It's important to note that science and religion serve different purposes and address different aspects of human experience. Science explores the natural world and seeks to understand the mechanisms behind natural phenomena, while religion often deals with questions of meaning, purpose, and the spiritual realm. Many people find value in both science and religion and see them as complementary rather than contradictory.
Ultimately, whether someone chooses to prioritize science or religious beliefs depends on their personal perspective, values, and understanding of the world. People's beliefs and preferences can vary, and it's important to respect different viewpoints and engage in open and respectful dialogue when discussing these topics.