The scientific consensus is that there is no credible scientific evidence supporting the claims of astrology. Astrology is not considered a scientific discipline because its foundational principles and methods are not based on empirical evidence, rigorous testing, or the application of scientific methodologies.
Astrology posits that celestial bodies, such as the positions of planets and stars, have an influence on human affairs and individual personalities. However, numerous scientific studies examining astrology's claims have failed to find any consistent and verifiable correlation between celestial positions and human characteristics or events.
Astrological predictions and personality descriptions are typically based on astrological charts, which assign meanings and interpretations to the positions of celestial bodies at the time of an individual's birth. However, these interpretations are not based on objective and universally agreed-upon principles. Different astrologers may provide different interpretations for the same celestial configurations, leading to inconsistencies and subjectivity.
Scientific investigations into astrology have often been conducted using rigorous methodologies, including large-scale statistical analyses and controlled experiments. These studies have consistently failed to demonstrate astrology's validity beyond what would be expected by chance.
It's important to note that many people may find personal meaning or enjoyment in astrology, and it may have cultural or psychological significance for some individuals. However, when evaluated from a scientific perspective, astrology lacks empirical evidence and does not meet the criteria for a scientifically valid explanation or predictive system.
Scientists and skeptics argue that any perceived accuracy or apparent connections between astrological predictions and individual experiences can often be attributed to cognitive biases, subjective interpretations, self-fulfilling prophecies, or the Barnum effect (where general statements are perceived as highly accurate due to their vague and broad nature).
In summary, while astrology may have cultural or personal value for some individuals, the scientific community has not found any credible evidence to support its claims. It is not considered a scientific discipline, and its predictive and explanatory abilities have not withstood scientific scrutiny.