I can provide information based on scientific consensus.
The overwhelming majority of scientists across various disciplines, including geology, astronomy, physics, and biology, agree that the Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old. This age is supported by a wide range of independent lines of evidence, including radiometric dating of rocks and minerals, studies of Earth's geological processes, the fossil record, and astronomical observations.
Radiometric dating methods, such as uranium-lead dating or potassium-argon dating, rely on the decay of radioactive isotopes in rocks to estimate their ages. These methods have been extensively tested and validated, producing consistent results that support an ancient Earth.
Additionally, geological processes, such as plate tectonics and erosion, take place over long periods and are not compatible with a young Earth model. The fossil record also provides evidence of life forms that have existed for millions of years, further supporting the antiquity of the Earth.
Claims that the Earth is only around 5,000 years old are primarily based on interpretations of religious texts, such as the biblical account of creation. However, it is important to note that the scientific consensus is based on empirical evidence and rigorous testing, while the claim of a young Earth relies on a different type of reasoning.
In the scientific community, the age of the Earth is considered settled science, supported by a vast body of evidence. It is important to distinguish between scientific consensus, which is formed through rigorous investigation and peer review, and personal beliefs or religious interpretations, which can vary among individuals.