The term "settled science" is sometimes considered an oxymoron because science is a process of constant questioning, testing, and refining our understanding of the natural world. Scientific knowledge is based on evidence, empirical data, and rigorous analysis, and it is subject to revision and refinement as new information emerges.
In the scientific method, hypotheses are proposed, experiments are conducted, and results are analyzed to draw conclusions. However, science acknowledges that new evidence or alternative explanations can challenge existing theories and lead to revisions in our understanding. This iterative process allows scientific knowledge to evolve and improve over time.
Therefore, the idea of science being "settled" implies that it has reached a final and unchanging state, which is contrary to the fundamental nature of scientific inquiry. While certain scientific theories may be widely accepted based on extensive evidence and consensus among experts, they are still subject to modification or even rejection if new evidence or theories emerge that better explain the observed phenomena.
It's important to note that the term "settled science" is often used colloquially in discussions to convey a high degree of confidence in a particular scientific theory or consensus. However, within the scientific community, scientists understand that all knowledge is subject to ongoing scrutiny and refinement.