+19 votes
in Science by
edited by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
+3 votes
by

According to our current scientific understanding, living things do not develop from non-living objects through natural processes. The concept of spontaneous generation, which proposed that living organisms could arise spontaneously from inanimate matter, was disproven by experiments conducted in the 19th century.

The prevailing scientific view is that living organisms, from simple single-celled organisms to complex multicellular organisms, arise from pre-existing living organisms through processes such as reproduction, cell division, or sexual reproduction. These processes involve the transfer of genetic information, either through DNA or RNA, which carries the instructions for the development and functioning of living organisms.

While scientists have been able to synthesize simple organic molecules, such as amino acids, nucleotides, and sugars, under conditions simulating early Earth, these are still far from being considered living organisms. The origin of life remains a topic of active scientific research, and various hypotheses have been proposed, such as the RNA world hypothesis, which suggests that the first self-replicating molecules were based on RNA.

It's important to note that any claims of living things emerging from non-living objects would require robust scientific evidence and verification before being accepted by the scientific community.

Welcome to Physicsgurus Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...