No, believing in science without being a scientist is not the same as blind faith. Blind faith typically refers to belief without evidence or rational justification. In contrast, scientific beliefs are based on evidence, empirical data, and the application of rigorous methods to test and verify hypotheses.
Science is a systematic process of inquiry that relies on observation, experimentation, and peer review. It is built on a foundation of evidence, logical reasoning, and the accumulation of knowledge through the scientific method. Scientists work to generate and interpret data, develop theories, and make predictions based on empirical evidence.
Believing in science without being a scientist means accepting scientific findings, theories, and conclusions that are supported by evidence and have undergone rigorous scrutiny. It does not require personal expertise or conducting scientific research oneself. Instead, it is about trusting the scientific community and recognizing the value of the scientific process.
While it is important to critically evaluate scientific claims and be aware of the limitations of scientific knowledge, accepting scientific consensus based on the available evidence is not blind faith. It is a rational and informed stance that acknowledges the role of science in advancing our understanding of the natural world.