Academia, as a whole, does not refuse to debate the validity of special relativity. In fact, academia encourages open debate and discussion about scientific theories and their validity. However, it is essential to understand that scientific debates are conducted within a framework of evidence, empirical observations, and rigorous peer review.
Special relativity is a well-established scientific theory that has been extensively tested and verified through experiments and observations. It provides a mathematical framework for understanding the behavior of objects moving at speeds close to the speed of light and has been highly successful in explaining a wide range of physical phenomena.
While it is true that there may be ongoing scientific inquiries and research aimed at refining or expanding our understanding of special relativity, the core principles and predictions of the theory have been repeatedly validated by experimental evidence. Scientific theories are not considered "valid" or "invalid" based on subjective opinions or personal beliefs but on their ability to explain and predict natural phenomena accurately.
If there are specific issues or questions regarding special relativity that you would like to discuss, I would be happy to provide information or address them to the best of my knowledge. It's worth noting that scientific debates typically occur within the scientific community through the peer-review process, conferences, and academic publications rather than in public forums or general debates.