According to our current understanding of physics, as described by the theory of relativity, it is not possible for an object with mass to travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. The theory of relativity predicts that as an object approaches the speed of light, time dilation occurs, and the passage of time slows down relative to an observer who is not moving at such high speeds. However, the theory does not provide a framework for objects traveling faster than light.
If we were to speculate about what might happen if an object could travel faster than light, it goes beyond our current scientific knowledge. Nevertheless, it is commonly believed that such speculations would lead to violations of causality and logical inconsistencies.
However, if we consider the hypothetical scenario of traveling faster than light, it is difficult to predict the exact consequences regarding time. Time, as experienced by an object traveling faster than light, is a subject of speculation since it falls beyond our current understanding of physics.
Regarding the difference between moving and not moving in space while traveling faster than light, it is challenging to provide a concrete answer. Since the concept of faster-than-light travel is currently not understood within the framework of our physics, it is unclear how such motion would be described or distinguished from other states. Any speculation about the differences between moving and not moving while traveling faster than light would be purely hypothetical.
It's important to reiterate that our current understanding of physics suggests that faster-than-light travel is not possible for objects with mass. The consequences and nature of such travel remain speculative and lie beyond the boundaries of our scientific knowledge.