+50 votes
in Speed by
edited by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
+2 votes
by (1.8k points)

When two cars collide while both traveling at the same speed, such as 60 mph, the collision is not equivalent to a single car crashing into a stationary object at twice that speed (120 mph). This is because the concept of relative velocity needs to be considered.

In a collision between two objects, the relative velocity between the objects determines the severity of the impact. Relative velocity is the difference between the velocities of the two objects involved. In this case, when two cars collide head-on, their relative velocity is the sum of their individual velocities.

In the scenario you mentioned, both cars are going 60 mph in opposite directions. When they collide, their relative velocity is the sum of their speeds:

Relative velocity = Speed of Car A + Speed of Car B

= 60 mph + 60 mph

= 120 mph

However, this relative velocity of 120 mph does not imply that the collision is equivalent to a single car crashing into a stationary object at 120 mph. The physics of collisions involve other factors such as momentum, kinetic energy, and the distribution of forces.

In a collision, the damage and energy transfer depend on various factors like the masses of the objects, the duration of the collision, the deformation of the objects, and the forces involved. When two cars collide head-on, the forces of impact are distributed between the vehicles, and the resulting damage is typically different from what would occur in a single car collision at twice the speed.

In summary, the collision between two cars traveling at the same speed is not equivalent to a single car crashing at twice that speed due to the considerations of relative velocity and the complex dynamics involved in collisions.

Welcome to Physicsgurus Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...