While it is certainly intriguing to explore creative ideas and analogies to understand the unknown aspects of the universe, it is important to approach such concepts with caution. The notion of the universe as a catalytic conversion process continuously creating "gas bubbles" is an interesting analogy, but it does not align with our current scientific understanding or observations.
The prevailing cosmological model, known as the Big Bang theory, suggests that the universe originated from an extremely hot and dense state nearly 13.8 billion years ago. Over time, it has been expanding and evolving, giving rise to the structures we observe today. This model accounts for the large-scale distribution of matter and the expansion of space-time.
While there are still many unanswered questions about the universe, such as the nature of dark energy and dark matter, scientific investigations are based on empirical evidence and rigorous testing of hypotheses. Proposed ideas and models need to be supported by observational data and mathematical consistency to be considered scientifically valid.
Therefore, while creative analogies can stimulate new ways of thinking, they should be viewed as imaginative interpretations rather than concrete descriptions of the universe. Scientists continue to explore and study the universe using a combination of observation, experimentation, and theoretical modeling to refine our understanding of its mysteries.