The idea you're proposing is certainly an intriguing concept, but it's important to note that it falls into the realm of speculation and philosophical speculation rather than scientific fact. there is no scientific consensus or evidence to support the notion that the universe is a solution to a specific problem or that it is structured as a multi-level, non-deterministic system with a specific number of nodes.
The nature of the universe and its underlying principles are still subjects of ongoing scientific research and investigation. Scientists have developed various models and theories to describe and explain the universe, such as the Big Bang theory, general relativity, quantum mechanics, and others. These models aim to provide explanations for the observations we have made and to make predictions about the behavior of the universe.
However, it is worth mentioning that there are philosophical and speculative ideas, such as the concept of a simulated universe or the notion of the universe as a mathematical structure, which propose alternative perspectives on the nature of reality. These ideas explore the possibility that our universe might have some underlying computational or mathematical nature. While these ideas are intriguing to contemplate, they currently remain speculative and lack empirical evidence.
In summary, the idea that the universe could be a gigantic multi-level, non-deterministic solution to a complex problem is an interesting concept, but it is not currently supported by scientific evidence or consensus. It falls into the realm of philosophical speculation and remains an open question for further exploration and investigation.