No, the Big Bang theory is not comparable to "young universe creationism" or a science dogma. It is a scientific theory that has been extensively supported by empirical evidence and has undergone rigorous testing and refinement over many decades.
The Big Bang theory proposes that the universe originated from a highly dense and hot state approximately 13.8 billion years ago. It explains the expansion of space, the abundance of light elements, and the cosmic microwave background radiation, among other observed phenomena. The age of the universe estimated by the Big Bang theory is based on a variety of observational data and calculations, including the measurements of the cosmic microwave background radiation and the rates of cosmic expansion.
Importantly, scientific theories, including the Big Bang theory, are subject to revision and refinement based on new evidence and observations. Scientists continuously gather data and perform experiments to test and challenge existing theories. If new evidence emerges that contradicts the Big Bang theory or provides a more comprehensive explanation, the scientific community would assess and revise the theory accordingly.
In contrast, "young universe creationism" is a belief based on religious or philosophical interpretations that assert a relatively young age for the universe, typically in the range of a few thousand to tens of thousands of years. It is not based on empirical evidence or the scientific method, and it does not undergo scientific testing or revision.
It's important to recognize the distinction between scientific theories, which are based on empirical evidence and subject to scrutiny and revision, and belief systems or dogmas, which are typically founded on non-scientific principles and often lack empirical evidence or the ability to adapt to new discoveries.