Flat-Earthers, who adhere to the belief that the Earth is flat rather than spherical, do not have a unified or consistent view on black holes since their perspectives can vary. However, there are a few common arguments or viewpoints that some flat-Earthers may hold regarding black holes:
Denial of Existence: Some flat-Earthers may deny the existence of black holes altogether. They may argue that black holes are a fictional concept invented by scientists to support a spherical Earth model or to perpetuate a conspiracy.
Alternative Explanations: Other flat-Earthers may propose alternative explanations for phenomena typically associated with black holes. They might attribute the observations attributed to black holes, such as gravitational lensing or the absence of visible light, to other mechanisms that fit within their flat Earth model. For example, they may suggest that gravitational lensing is caused by unknown forces or electromagnetic phenomena.
Misinterpretation of Evidence: Flat-Earthers might interpret scientific evidence related to black holes in a way that supports their flat Earth beliefs. They may argue that the scientific measurements and observations used to support the existence of black holes are flawed or biased, or that they can be explained within their flat Earth framework.
It's important to note that these perspectives are not supported by mainstream science. The existence of black holes is well-established through extensive observational and theoretical evidence, including observations of their effects on surrounding matter, gravitational waves, and the behavior of stars in their vicinity.
Flat-Earthers' rejection or alternative explanations for black holes generally stem from their overall rejection of mainstream science and their adherence to alternative, often unsupported, theories about the nature of the Earth and the universe.