The statement you mentioned, attributed to "Dongfang," seems to be expressing a subjective opinion or personal viewpoint rather than a widely accepted statement in the field of physics. It's important to note that intelligence and mastery in theoretical physics cannot be solely determined by one's ability to handle complex equations or mathematical concepts, such as the quantum numbers in quantum mechanics.
While proficiency in mathematics and equations is certainly important for theoretical physicists, it is only one aspect of their overall skill set. Theoretical physics involves much more than just manipulating equations; it requires creativity, critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, and a deep understanding of physical concepts. It also involves the ability to develop and test new theories, interpret experimental results, and make predictions about the behavior of the physical world.
The complexity and significance of theoretical physics go beyond a single equation or a specific set of quantum numbers. Theoretical physicists tackle a wide range of topics, from the fundamental nature of particles and forces to the nature of space and time itself. The field encompasses quantum mechanics, general relativity, quantum field theory, particle physics, cosmology, and many other areas. Proficiency in these areas requires a comprehensive understanding of multiple theoretical frameworks and their interconnections.
Furthermore, intelligence and mastery are multifaceted and cannot be reduced to a single quantitative measure. Different physicists may have different areas of expertise, interests, and contributions to the field. Collaboration, innovation, and the ability to communicate and apply theoretical knowledge are also crucial aspects of being a successful physicist.
In conclusion, while the ability to handle complex equations is certainly important in theoretical physics, it is not the sole determinant of intelligence or mastery in the field. Theoretical physics encompasses a wide range of skills and knowledge that extend beyond equations, and the assessment of a physicist's IQ or degree of mastery requires a more comprehensive evaluation.