Theoretical possibilities and remote possibilities are both concepts that describe potential outcomes or events, but they differ in terms of their likelihood and proximity to reality. Here's a breakdown of their differences:
Likelihood: Theoretical possibilities refer to potential events or outcomes that are within the realm of possibility based on current knowledge, principles, or theories. They may be supported by existing scientific, mathematical, or logical frameworks but may not have been observed or proven yet. Theoretical possibilities are often considered more probable or feasible than remote possibilities.
Remote possibilities, on the other hand, are events or outcomes that are highly unlikely or improbable. They are far less likely to occur compared to theoretical possibilities. Remote possibilities are often considered to be on the fringes of plausibility, with very low probabilities of happening.
Proximity to reality: Theoretical possibilities are closely related to the existing body of knowledge, scientific theories, or logical reasoning. They are often grounded in established principles or frameworks, even if they have not been fully explored or proven. Theoretical possibilities are more likely to be explored through research, experimentation, or further analysis.
Remote possibilities, on the contrary, are typically more distant from current knowledge and may not align with established theories or frameworks. They often involve highly speculative scenarios or events that are beyond the current understanding of the world. Remote possibilities are often considered as outliers or extreme scenarios.
Potential for realization: Theoretical possibilities have a greater potential for eventual realization compared to remote possibilities. As scientific knowledge advances, theoretical possibilities can be tested, refined, and eventually become accepted as established facts or principles. They may serve as starting points for further exploration and discovery.
Remote possibilities, due to their low likelihood and speculative nature, are less likely to be realized or become accepted as established facts. While it's not entirely impossible for remote possibilities to occur, their realization often requires significant changes in the current understanding of the world or the occurrence of extraordinary circumstances.
In summary, theoretical possibilities are more plausible and grounded in existing knowledge or theories, while remote possibilities are highly unlikely and exist on the fringes of plausibility. Theoretical possibilities have a greater potential for realization and are more closely related to current understanding, while remote possibilities are distant and speculative.