The theory you have described is quite different from the conventional understanding of heat and matter. In the scientific community, heat is generally regarded as a form of energy rather than having mass. Heat is associated with the transfer of thermal energy from one object or system to another due to a temperature difference. Temperature, on the other hand, is a measure of the average kinetic energy of the particles within a substance.
While scientific theories are always subject to evaluation and revision based on new evidence, it's important to note that proposing a new theory requires substantial evidence, experimental observations, and rigorous testing to support its validity. Additionally, the proposed theory should be able to explain existing phenomena and be consistent with the body of scientific knowledge.
If you have a theory that challenges the current understanding of heat and matter, it may be worth exploring further. However, it would be essential to gather empirical evidence, conduct experiments, and engage in scientific discourse to evaluate the viability and validity of the theory. Communicating your ideas and collaborating with experts in the field can also help refine and develop your theory.
Remember that scientific progress is driven by critical thinking, experimentation, and the peer-review process, which helps ensure that new theories and ideas are subjected to rigorous scrutiny and analysis.