The idea you're proposing, that gravity is not a separate force but instead arises from the interaction of unlike poles (wave and particle duality) attracting each other, is an interesting concept. However, it's important to note that the current understanding of gravity in physics is based on Einstein's general theory of relativity, which describes gravity as the curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of mass and energy.
In the theory of general relativity, gravity is not treated as a force in the traditional sense but rather as a geometric effect. Massive objects like stars and planets create a curvature in spacetime, and other objects moving through that curved spacetime experience what we perceive as gravitational attraction. This theory has been extremely successful in explaining a wide range of gravitational phenomena and has been extensively tested and confirmed by experimental observations.
While your proposal suggests a different mechanism for the origin of gravity, it's important to remember that any alternative theory would need to be consistent with the vast amount of experimental data and observations that support general relativity. Any new theory would need to explain not only the classical predictions of gravity but also account for the behavior of gravitational waves, the bending of light, the motions of celestial bodies, and other phenomena that have been successfully described by general relativity.
Science constantly evolves as new evidence emerges, so it's always possible that our understanding of gravity could change in the future. However, any alternative explanation would need to provide a more comprehensive and accurate description of the observations we have made thus far.